Stalins Methods for Removing the Opposition - 802 Words

To define how Stalin’s methods in removing opposition is effective, compared to tsarist and other communist leaders, his methods of suppression alongside the tsars and other communists are assessed to see how successful they were in defeating opposition without evoking further opposition in their regimes. Therefore, Stalin’s reforms of collectivisation, Five-Year-Plans, Gulags, and labour camps etc. have been successful in appeasing opposition with his increased and radicalized input of terror compared to Lenin’s use of terror during the Civil War in 1917-1921, which does not equate to the same economic success that Stalin achieved with his policies. This is similar but different to the social and economic change after the 1905 revolution with Stolypin’s Duma and October manifesto used to supress revolutionaries but resulted in another assassination after reforms in 1911 with Stolypin and Alexander 2nd in 1881 with the Emancipation Edict in 1861. Whereas, Stalin’s strict rule of repression there was little room for revolutionaries to overthrow Stalin as during 1930 to 1933 the death toll in the camps were 10 million higher than the First World War to which, in 1936 the prisoners were nearly extinct in 1940 . Alongside this, Nicholas 2nd’s control of the army during the 1905 revolution, which went for stability to a catastrophic lack of control as the military conflict sparked economic and political disorder which led to Nicholas 2nd abdicating in 1917; similar to theShow MoreRelatedThe Progression from Leninism to Stalinism Essay1405 Words   |  6 PagesTrotsky, a friend of Lenin and a staunch opponent of Stalin, grudgingly admits that Stalinism did issue from Bolshevism (Trotsky). Stalins policy of socialism in one country, his use of terror to eliminate opposition, and his suppression of democracy and the soviets were all characteristics of Lenin well before they were characteristic of Stalin. Although some of S talins policies were different from those of Lenin, what difference Stalinism did show from Leninism were either policies which Lenin hadRead MoreEssay on Evaluation of Stalins Rule of the USSR2639 Words   |  11 PagesEvaluation of Stalins Rule of the USSR This statement about Stalins ruling of the USSR between the years 1928 and 1941 is more than just black and white. The preceding social influences of the Communist Party, coupled with the practical side of putting all of these ideas into use caused an extremely complex situation. Stalins ideas benefited some, greatly disadvantaged others and completely changed the way the USSR was run and how all sectors of public life wereRead MoreSoviet Union Demonstrated Stunning Industrial Growth1895 Words   |  8 Pagescapitalism in the now communist Russia was unacceptable, as it was contradicting the communist ideal of the many working together for the benefit of all. Stalin’s means to fix these ideas was an attempt at intense foundational change in Russian agriculture, the violent move of collectivization. Stalin’s collectivization of agriculture involved removing the peasants from their farms and creating large, â€Å"streamlined† farms, that would supposedly produce more harvest, more efficiently, and with fewer workersRead MoreDiscussion on Whether Stalin Was a Necessary Evil Essay2325 Words   |  10 Pagesdeath in 1924 began a period of debate over the direction the Revolution should take. Since Lenin gave no directions as to how the Soviet Union should move on from the NEP or how long it should last, similar to the situation crated after Stalins death, a debate arose that ultimately became power struggle for the leadership of the Party and the Soviet Union between Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. Stalin felt intellectually inferior to others and so to differentiate himself Read MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesâ€Å"Family and Personal Networks in International Migration: Recent Developments and New Agendas,† International Migration Review 23 (1989): 638–670; James H. Jackson and Leslie Page Moch, â€Å"Migration and the Social History of Modern Europe,† Historical Methods 22 (1989): 27–36; Ivan Light and Parminder Bachu, eds., Immigration and Entrepreneurship (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1993), 25–49; Alejandro Portes and Jà ³zsef Bà ¶rà ¶cz, â€Å"Contemporary Immigration: Theoretical Perspectives on Its Determinants